Transfer Window Thread

[steevie]

We could sign Ronaldo and still our fans would find some complaint. EvertonFansThat.

 

[ilikecheese]

'Geri' cant get a game!!!

Besides of course the three he's already played in.

 

[II McColl II]

Im happy with Lennon as most people would agree he proved enough last season towards signing him but all in all this window has been very very poor.

Funes Mori covers 1 of the needs we had but we have still completely ignored the #10 spot unless we have some hidden loan no one knows anything about.

We are massively right sided Lennon, Mirallas, Del, McGeady (hoepfully not very often) and only Pienaar who is natural on the left but seems finished. Mirallas always seem anonymous when he starts out left so seems odd to ignore key areas he spoke about signing players in.

 

[Bungle]

16:42

BREAKING NEWS

Sky sources: Steven Naismith will be staying with Everton after they rejected an offer from Norwich City. We understand the proposed fee was around £7m to £8m.

Sunderland also understood to have expressed an interest in the Scottish forward but it was never close to happening. Naismith has been training with the Scotland squad today.

From SSN Transfer Center:
http://www.skysports.com/transfer-centre/

 

[Greek Fisherman]

Besides of course the three he's already played in.

for 5 mins a pop!?

 

[noddy78]

Lennon, sound. No creative attacking midfielder, not sound.

Bit confusing this one unless mcgeady is on his bike, 4 wingers an still no No.10.

No doubting Lennon did well for us last season not unhappy with his signing at all, now if Bobby could pull one more rabbit out the hat this window would go from ok to great!

 

[Bigmaclad]

To be fair, I'd have well taken £8m and given the squad role to McAleny or something, or loaned a forward.

£8m for Naismith is too good to turn down IMO, and I don't actually mind him.

Agree it's a lot of money.

People also need to realise Sky's "Sources" are often really reall flimsy/not true

 

[davek]

apparently true

FFS.

That can only be because of Cleverley getting crocked.

That tackle from Dier has indeed been dear.

 

[marty mcfly]

Of course he should have sold Stones. He'll leave anyway in the near future. I said this all along. Sell Stones and get quality players in. Of course, that earned a load of abuse of the "experts" on here looking to keep their hero in place.

Joke a of a decision given what's happening now. I hope those who were adamant they wanted that streak of Yorkshire piss to stay are happy with their victory.

No he shouldn't have. We would have been lucky to get 30m net. A decent CB would cost almost half that.

What he shouldn't have done is spend 10m on some unknown Argentinian, Lennon and a load of kids that probably will never make it.

 

[Ashtonian]

if we have rejected a naismith sale it is because we can't replace him. I am sure martinez would sell up for that price if we could sign someone else in.

We aren't signing this creative player, so naismith covers that role in the squad.....sadly

 

[bizzaro]

McGeady has got pace like.

But he's ball greedy. Doesn't look for a pass and has never looked like he is going to perform at Everton. I can't remember a game we have won with him in the side and ahead of Coleman.

 

[Greek Fisherman]

Bit confusing this one unless mcgeady is on his bike, 4 wingers an still no No.10.!

reeks of desperation

 

[toffeejack]

If Lennon is coming in, you'd expect McGeady to be off.

No way would we have 3 right wingers on the books...

mcgeady's so good he plays left and right mate.

 

[Tchnique]

If a 7-8m bid for Naismith was submitted then I'm King of Candyland.

 

[hktoffee]

Naismith is not for sale. Money can't buy you everything.

WE'RE BUILDING A PHANTOM GENERATION.

Money can't buy you Nais.