New Everton Stadium

[MickA]

Is this new?

http://www.liverpoolwaters.co.uk/building/proposed-everton-football-club-stadium/

 

[SpongeBob brown shoes]

Is this new?

http://www.liverpoolwaters.co.uk/building/proposed-everton-football-club-stadium/

Must be getting close to some annoucment, only Everton could end up playing crap to make the stadium annoucment seem not that important right now, they've really took the shine of it hahaha

 

[eddy]

 

[GwladysBlue]

Is this new?

http://www.liverpoolwaters.co.uk/building/proposed-everton-football-club-stadium/

£300m?

I thought we were getting a world class venue that would be the envy of the league?

Surely we haven't been lied to again

 

[LouReedwalkonthewildside]

He's on crack

He deserves a crack!

 

[Dublin blue 75]

In construction projects of this scale, any cost referred to in advance is an estimate at best. You can expect whatever figure is mooted now to be significantly lower than the eventual bill.

 

[BunnerJnr]

In construction projects of this scale, any cost referred to in advance is an estimate at best. You can expect whatever figure is mooted now to be significantly lower than the eventual bill.

So that Buro Happold brochure that had to be removed from here was genuine then!

 

[orly]

£300m?

I thought we were getting a world class venue that would be the envy of the league?

Surely we haven't been lied to again

Dunno you know. Think that's quite a lot of money for a non-London build.

 

[The binman chronicles]

£300m?

I thought we were getting a world class venue that would be the envy of the league?

Surely we haven't been lied to again

300 million will buy you a lot of 4x2... i'm expecting something half decent.

It was never going to be a decked out with the highest quality materials, think more the Millennium Stadium rather than Wembley.

 

[RobSpurs]

So that Buro Happold brochure that had to be removed from here was genuine then!

Don't think that was ever in any doubt. It looked detailed and genuine and the fact it had to be removed was a bit of a clincher.

 

[Dublin blue 75]

Don't think that was ever in any doubt. It looked detailed and genuine and the fact it had to be removed was a bit of a clincher.

Yes, that design spec was sufficiently detailed and had clearly had detailed project management / technical input that it is a very close approximation of what we will eventually see. Assuming we aren't relegated.

 

[R934]

For those who haven't seen said document

http://www.blueheartbluesoul.com/le...on-are-aiming-big-with-their-new-stadium.html

Unsure if posting a link circumvents the removal (admins feel free to take down if required)

 

[RobSpurs]

For those who haven't seen said document

http://www.blueheartbluesoul.com/le...on-are-aiming-big-with-their-new-stadium.html

Unsure if posting a link circumvents the removal (admins feel free to take down if required)

I feel like I know far too much about this stadium saga, but the bottom two pictures on that site are from a design competition on skyscrapercity forums, they're NOT from the BH document! The other pics all are, however.

 

[orly]

300 million will buy you a lot of 4x2... i'm expecting something half decent.

It was never going to be a decked out with the highest quality materials, think more the Millennium Stadium rather than Wembley.

£300m for a 60k seater would mean a really high quality finish

 

[The binman chronicles]

£300m for a 60k seater would mean a really high quality finish

Well i hope you are right but I believe that it would be somewhere inbetween Kirkby and a HQ fit and finish. (Bare concrete floors and block work walls etc.) I suppose it does depend if being on the docks makes it significantly cheaper to get the materials onsite.