Cos everybody knows they never spend money, those Yanks are tight.Why have you left the RS off that list?
150m spent last Transfer Window.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Cos everybody knows they never spend money, those Yanks are tight.Why have you left the RS off that list?
That's basically what FFP is now. It will only help the clubs already at the top as they have more revenue in the first place.There will always be haves and have nots. % of revenues is probably the fairest of the options. It forces owners to live within their means.
City should be able to spend more than Luton, but shouldn’t be able so spend an unlimited amount. Owners who can cut bait at any time shouldn’t be able to leave clubs with massive, unsustainable wage bills.That's basically what FFP is now. It will only help the clubs already at the top as they have more revenue in the first place.
So the status quo is preserved. There really seems to be no way around it outside a hard salary cap, not a percentage.City should be able to spend more than Luton, but shouldn’t be able so spend an unlimited amount. Owners who can cut bait at any time shouldn’t be able to leave clubs with massive, unsustainable wage bills.
A salary cap just punishes the players.So the status quo is preserved. There really seems to be no way around it outside a hard salary cap, not a percentage.
You’d need all clubs in the world to agree to a hard cap. That’s never going to happen. You’d also need a closed system and a way to unnaturally distribute talent.So the status quo is preserved. There really seems to be no way around it outside a hard salary cap, not a percentage.
They're already overpaid, FFS.The Premier League is the richest in Europe. Where the hell would they go? They can't ALL play in Saudi Arabia. Salary caps exist in the NBA and NHL and work just fine.A salary cap just punishes the players.
And would result in them leaving for other Leagues.
Oh right, I suppose NFL/NBA and NHL players could just go play in a different country.They're already overpaid, FFS.The Premier League is the richest in Europe. Where the hell would they go? They can't ALL play in Saudi Arabia. Salary caps exist in the NBA and NHL and work just fine.
There are European basketball and hockey leagues, you know. You want a more level playing field? Limit how much teams can spend on players. It forces clubs to be a little smarter about what and when they spend and stops teams from stockpiling players.Oh right, I suppose NFL/NBA and NHL players could just go play in a different country.
No, I didnt.There are European basketball and hockey leagues, you know.
A salary cap just punishes the players.
And would result in them leaving for other Leagues.
The effectively are. Player fees and wages are by far the largest expense for clubs. If you limit the amount they are allowed to lose, you are then limiting player salaries.There are European basketball and hockey leagues, you know. You want a more level playing field? Limit how much teams can spend on players. It forces clubs to be a little smarter about what and when they spend and stops teams from stockpiling players.
Somewhere in between, probably a bit closer to the higher end. Maybe an average of the 17 teams who avoid relegation. Some formula could be drawn up fairly easily, I would think.No, I didnt.
Where would you put the salary cap?
At City or at Luton?
If the cap was introduced across Europe it wouldnt be a bad idea, but England would lose its "appeal" a little and The EPL would not like that.Somewhere in between, probably a bit closer to the higher end. Maybe an average of the 17 teams who avoid relegation. Some formula could be drawn up fairly easily, I would think.
Where would you put Madrids in relation to that?Somewhere in between, probably a bit closer to the higher end. Maybe an average of the 17 teams who avoid relegation. Some formula could be drawn up fairly easily, I would think.