• Participation within this subforum is only available to members who have had 5+ posts approved elsewhere.

Champions League revamp

Status
Not open for further replies.
Unfortunately the trusts have no real say in the actual club though so I'm not sure it really does much besides saying that we feel for the fans who don't want this.

Well for example, if all of the local fans worked together and boycotted going to the game (when crowds return), it might hurt a bit if Anfield only had 10k fans in it and fans outside were picketing.
 

It's called a strike from everybody who works there. That would be the way to make the owners walk, when they lose value in their investment. But that would also mean you'd have to somehow block people from joining. The strike would probably mean there's some sort of 'legal' action taken on the players/staff which would need to be supported by the rest of us somehow. Otherwise they could run down their contracts and not renew.

The biggest problem is when you're organising a group is to act united. Because it only takes a few from a large group to be tempted. And this is why money/power wins all (most) of the time.

combined with this. Get the actual players and fans from these super clubs on your side rather than villainizing them. Imagine if all 12 super clubs players refused to plan until the end of the season and 10k fans showed up outside the stadium during the previously scheduled match time to protest. That’s how you break this thing. Realistic? Not really. But this is my general point, call upon the non-owners to “do the right thing” and mobilize the fans against these owners
 
Pay whatever the penalties are and walk away.

Both Chelsea and City can afford to.



d) they know they have to say something, but have nothing of consequence to say, so they go on in front of the least hostile audience possible in the time slot least likely to generate coverage and hope for the best.
But I don’t see that as a professional public relations strategy. Yes it might be a pig of an idea but at least you try to put lipstick on it.

Agree with Rory Smith (~5mins in) on this podcast

There is a way to present this that at the least means that the fans of the clubs involved have some material to argue for the Super League, instead there was no initial no counter argument for those fans to latch onto so you leave them influenced by their own thoughts, Sky (who obviously have their own reasons for not liking it) or none SL fans who won’t be in favor.

Add to this you leave your own managers facing the music when they had no part in the decision and very clearly thrown under a media bus and it is an utter mess of a rollout.
 

my take on MNF

GN: Totally against it
JG: not sure he actually against it. Spoke a load of drivel and found it hard to go against his RS team, stupid questions to the Palace chairman
PL: Are going to do zero today and beg them not to do it
 

Presumably the clubs will be saving money on their youth development (since no sane parent would sign up their son to a banned club when there is virtually no chance of them making it there).
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top