Debunkology
Player Valuation: £10m
I really can’t understand where this club is going at the moment.
It seems to be a patchwork of multiple “projects”.
It seems to be a lack of patience.
From our board and the fans.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I really can’t understand where this club is going at the moment.
It seems to be a patchwork of multiple “projects”.
We have to accept we have very limited pull, and we have to get the balance right with new signings.
Of course there is room for experienced players in their late 20s who will improve us immediately. And older if on a free.
That type of business though has to be limited.
There is enough time left, but we do need to compliment each expensive and older-profile type signing with one that could help turn a profit and balance the books a few years down the line. Ideally such younger players would not leave at all and be a mainstay in the side for a decade.
We can assume there is depth to the Allan and Doucouré links, but whilst Allan in particular seems an clear upgrade, I hope to be convinced in the next few weeks that we are taking a more strategic view on transfers. It's fine that Allan was Carlo's player, and Arias was Brands. They might think now that even Koeman is worth a call, for the next batch of Barca rejects.
I don't think we'll build a team that way. We can pitch for the best young players, under a world-class manager. Some of them may say Carlo who?. Come here, only for a few years if need be, get your game regularly, improve your game, and we won't stand in your way with career progression.
We need to look at Spurs, Atletico Madrid (although not recently for either) Lille, Borussia Dortmund, Atalanta, Leipzig. The niche is there for a Premiership club to develop along these lines. We have to maximise the cards we are dealt.
We should be aiming for success, not another repeat of the last 30 years. If disappointment happens then so be it, we will have to live with it like we have done for decades, but we shouldn't be setting being knocked out of the FA Cup as a target, or as a measure of success.
I went on a Watford forum the other day, and someone described us as the Middlesbrough of the North West. It's hard to argue, when you see numerous people, not just yourself, talk about finishing 8th and being knocked out of the FA Cup as a measure of success.
But was (allegedly) completed in about 1,010,450 days. Feels longer than that since we one anything lol
I’m not concerned with the ages of prospective signings. I’m more concerned that some of our 20odd year olds sometimes look more like 50odds who hate their job. Is it the park end getting on their cases, or is something else going on?couldn’t agree more. So sick of seeing posters whinge about player ages. It’s like we’ve just signed Gaza, Ginola etc.
Get a grip people
I don't subscribe to this idea of linear progression, I'm afraid. I don't think you need to finish 6th before you are allowed to finish in the top 4. I don't think Leicester, Wolves or Sheffield United subscribe to this idea either.
It seems to be a lack of patience.
From our board and the fans.
I don't get your point then.
Obviously we all want Everton to win the league next year, but we have to be realistic, thats not going to happen.
My point is that we should be aiming to win the cup competitions, not to get knocked out of them, and that we should be aiming to progress beyond the mid-table purgatory of the last 20 years.
We should be properly aiming to qualify for the Champions League, not in a 'anything is possible' kind of way, but in an 'it's entirely possible and should be our expectation' kind of way.
I have no issue with people challenging my opinion, the issue is that you appear to have completely misrepresented what my opinion actually is. You can play semantics if you want but neither the OP that I referenced or my post mentioned anything other than the team. If you want to pretend that just because the title of the thread says club we must have been talking about the stadium etc as well then you're welcome to, but it would be a bit weird.Of course you are allowed an opinion. But if you want to get defensive, so is everyone and you regularly challenge other peoples.
You ask why I'm talking about the stadium, suggesting I'm then answering points you didn't make, because you and the OP were OBVIOUSLY talking about the team, and only the team. In a thread called "Club Direction", with the opening line of the thread being "I really can’t understand where this club is going at the moment."
Well, the 2 are inextricably linked. As I mentioned, 1 of our biggest obstacles into achieving the growth we need is our ability to legally finance it. The stadium and its increased revenue with help with that in the long run. But for the time being, we are hamstrung.
The stadium, along with the appointment of Ancelotti, also both point towards the general ambition of the board, which is important in terms of measuring or assessing any supposed direction we are headed in.
You both claim a lack of direction in our signings, even though we haven't yet made any, but I questioned the logic of questioning the potential introduction of experienced players in favour of young talent. My reasoning being that there needs to be a balance of getting the team ready and able to compete, or at least improve in the short term, to give us a platform to introduce younger players further down the line. We could go and sign 4 or 5 '18-22' year old players with potential, but naturally, we would need to give them time to settle in and grow. They may have maybe 100 games worth of experience each, and we would expect them to not only instantly improve us, but give much needed experience to the promising young players we already have?
If you ask anyone where the current strengths of this team are, they would all, to a man, name 7 or 8 of the same players, all of whom are 23 or under. Ask the same question of what we lack, and other than Pickford, it's midfield mobility, experience, leadership, drive, and upgrades to positions where we have older players who are deemed past it or not good enough. It appears to me as though all of the players we are being linked with, address these very issues.
In terms of my bizzare statement on your guesswork, I am referring to the fact that you make assumptions on both immediate and long term improvement based on the quality of players we are signing. I'm assuming this has more to do Doucoure and less about Allan, given their respective teams and reputations. You may say its being realistic, and maybe 7th or 8th is a realistic step. But it's the overall negativity surrounding it which is what irks me. It would be realistic to want and to expect to achieve a gradual improvement. It is negative to suggest that gradual improvement is not good enough or fast enough. It is unrealistic to expect that we should be competing straight away. So while you may try and dress it as realism, it's genuinely not.
I'm not a happy clapper, I have been and can be as cynical as any when it comes to Everton. But I'm trying to offer some perspective to those who's heads are falling off because we haven't gone and signed 5 of the best players in the world in 1 fell swoop and turned us into title contenders that we deserve to be.
I'm wanting us to get behind Ancelotti, as genuinely 1 of, if not THE BIGGEST appointment we could have made, and indeed, have made in decades. There are signs for optimism, you just have to choose to see them.
We need experience but we can only attract 2nd rate.
We need quality so we have to take a chance on buying and developing young players .
To gain success we will have to somehow square this particular circle.
It isn’t easy or straightforward.
And it certainly won’t happen within this season,
I don't get your point then.
Obviously we all want Everton to win the league next year, but we have to be realistic, thats not going to happen.
Leicester
RS tooLeicester