What's everyone's obsession with the term "Richarlison replacement" we don't need a left winger, we need an actual striker. We have an abudance of left wingers which Richy was.
….yep, I agree but I think it’s terminology rather than like-for-like.
Richarlison was an effective central striker, especially in DCLs absence. We had two effective strikers and now we only have one. Richarlison replacement = an effective striker.