Of all their delusion their view of academy football is the most ridiculous. They are miles behind us. At under 18's level we finished 2nd overall last season in the top league and won it the season before. This was with several under 18's not being involved at all as they were playing reserves.
Last season they finished 2nd bottom of the 2nd division, one place above Brighton.
In terms of local talent we are light years ahead. It would be like comparing Manchester City to Blackburn. We hammered them 5-0 at under 18's level last season. We drew 3-3 with the at under 21's, in that game they had 0 players who were under 18 while we had 8 involved.
Essentially to make up for their appalling youth sides they regularly buy in 16/17 year olds for huge sums of money (the equivalent to our entire scouting budget). This allows them to play older lads in the relevant age groups and be competitive where they otherwise would be hammered 5/6-0 every week.
They are also obsessed with winning the under 21's league as if it were a barometer of something. The fact that last season we might have had Galloway, Browning, Garbutt, Lukaku, Barkley all playing in the first team instead of the under 21's would indicate how seriously we take it. But for them it's another tinpot trophy they can add to the list (or not as they still don't win it despite being one of the only teams to try to).