The key missing word is... Yet.
Think you may find that his option on additional share acquisition will happen once planning permission etc has been granted for BMD.
Point taken and lets hope so.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The key missing word is... Yet.
Think you may find that his option on additional share acquisition will happen once planning permission etc has been granted for BMD.
CASH FROM SALES
Despite being among the big spenders this season, Everton received the most income from player sales with £109.75m - primarily from Lukaku's move to Manchester United.
The Toffees also offloaded Gerard Deulofeu to Barcelona for £10.5m, Tom Cleverley to Watford for £8m and Gareth Barry switched to West Brom for £1m.
Other spendthrift clubs included Everton (£152.9m), Liverpool (£89.5m) and Tottenham (£61.4m).
BURNLEY NET SPEND: -£15.2MILLION
152.9 - 109.75 = net spend 43.15 mil....... Barkley £35 mil but changed his mind last minute at the medical in London, as per Jim White+ Mosh = 8.15 mil net, if Barkley had left as Moshiri clearly wanted him to ......
23.35 million higher spend than Burnley apologies Steve for my earlier mistake quoting 15 million ...............
A loan non the less. He also has an option to buy the remaining shares but has chosen not to. I never claimed to know the financial infrastructure
and complexity of the clubs accounts, that was you...... I merely offered an opinion that seems to have upset you somewhat
You can't accuse someone of asset stripping the club when the factual evidence i.e. the accounts shows that's simply not the case.
"It's my opinion" means jack, as all you've done is throw out an unsubstantiated accusation that has no basis in fact whatsoever.
It used to wind me up when people who didn't have a scoob about how businesses work used to throw the same accusation at Kenwright, who for all his many faults didn't take a bean out of the club when he was the majority shareholder.
It is a judgement call. But as I have said for months, the stadium is lift off for LCC/Liverpool Waters. Hence the ridiculously low repayment deal on the SPV thing. (That wont fund the whole thing anyrate, but it will give other players confidence to lob some eggs in the cake).
Then there is debt, and debt. Debt for EFC in our current situation, (Koeman/league all that notwithstanding), is a bad thing. He has effectively removed that from the balance sheet.
Debt with long term, "cheap" repayment vehicle, but with a sparkling iconic ground underpinning it, is way better.
Not perfect granted, but better.
The key missing word is... Yet.
Think you may find that his option on additional share acquisition will happen once planning permission etc has been granted for BMD.
The club lack vision and ambition and even if that wasn't the case, then there is a complete lack of the skills needed to follow through on any ambition in any case.
Even when we do spend money it seems to be on completely the wrong players. I can't understand how Moshiri hasn't binned off Walsh for the shambolic signings we've made. He's done footballing supermarket sweep.
A lot of these lads should be on the boardQuite fascinating all this isn't it.
I read months ago that if Everton have the proper amount of corporate boxes then the profit from these alone would pay for the loan
I’ve been in one at Croke park and it’s a totally different experience to my ordinary match day experience but they cost is frightening.
My company had / has one at Croke Park and is used for corporate entertainment.
The stadium is used for a variety of events
Union meetings
Small one day conferences
Weddings
Private parties.
Concerts ( restriction on number of times per year due to noise )
American football ( college games ) always sell out
A lot of money to be made from the stadium if it’s marketed right
you mean the interest only .... `loan` .... FACT
I think that's a great point, mate. We tried in another era to do this when we hired Trevor Birch but the club was in a complete mess and facing civil war in the boardroom.I think the club needs to be strategic. I popped on twitter the other day they should consider getting David Gill. That would be my starting point if I was Moshiri if phase 2 happens. Look to attract the best people from within the industry. The best paid CEO two years ago earned 2 million a year. Offer him 5 million a year, and a bonus of 5 million for every year he grows turnover none broadcast revenues by 30% (with a minimum increase of 15 million pounds). It might not work, he may be happy in his retirement, but 5 million a year basic will likely interest anyone.
Alternatively look to the private sector. Find any CEO who has shown they can go businesses over a 4-5 year period at 25% at through 5 million a year at them. Even for big firms this is a huge sum of money but in football it's the wages of Kevin Mirallas and Mo Besic. Frankly David Gill would make a bigger impact for Everton.
This is what I want to see more of from Farhad.
The interest free loan
No offence mate but your posts on the matter indicate that you haven’t got a clue
None taken. My opinion is different to yours that is all. My original post questioned the investment, I apologised for using the term `asset stripping`
however do question the overall investment. I have provided evidence that if Barkley had left as planned and admitted by our owner, then our investment would have been a pittance in my opinion. Also the Lukaku sale was `sell to buy` asset stripping ? perhaps a little harsh on the guy as the cash was reinvested in lesser quality players, increased wages etc, but sell to buy non the less.
The `club accountants` on this thread have had their say about all things financial however fail to qualify their own statements whilst requesting
that I should with mine, when I freely admit that I have not seen the accounts and due to the complexity of any premier league club in foreign ownership doubt it would make any difference anyway. For instance do the accounts show the add ons for Lukaku performance related bonuses in this tax year or the next? Was it 75 with add ons or 90 ? Did we finance the deal in the first place with payments over 2 or 3 years for tax reasons?
I have no idea, and neither do you. However I admit to forming an opinion with the limited information to hand similar to everyone else outside of the clubs boardroom ..... no offence but you are equally as clueless ..............
However I admit to forming an opinion with the limited information to hand similar to everyone else outside of the clubs boardroom ..... no offence but you are equally as clueless
when I freely admit that I have not seen the accounts and due to the complexity of any premier league club in foreign ownership doubt it would make any difference anyway.