Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

 

Farhad Moshiri

7+ Years On... Your Verdict On Farhad Moshiri

  • Pleased

    Votes: 107 7.7%
  • Disappointed

    Votes: 1,290 92.3%

  • Total voters
    1,397
e1795d03-d16b-471f-a879-1fd2dacecf84_text.gif
 
That Guardian article is interesting in one way: it tells us Usmanov was persona non grata prior to the war.

Beyond that, it is most interesting because the British prime minister actively touted for Mohammed bin Salman to buy Newcastle United, while his home secretary was busy tut-tutting at Everton.

The double-standard - not even implied in that article - is breathtaking.

I think it's great that the journalist in question has shone a light on how Usmanov was viewed by the British government. When will he be shining a light on Priti Patel's view of the Newcastle United takeover? Just for context, like.
All undesirables are equal in Downing Street it would appear.
At the Home Office, it would seem some are more equal than others.
 
The Guardian are utter liars and Cold War hawks.

They completely shat themselves after publishing the Snowden files and caved in to MI5.

They'll make up or embelish stories for them.
 

Some quotes from Brands Interview...

"...Yet things did not go as planned at Everton – Officially owned by British-Iranian businessman Farhad Moshiri, although oligarch Alisher Usmanov is closely involved in the background, according to The Guardian.

Despite a good relationship with club chairman Bill Kenwright – 'Indy' he called Brands, the chairman thought he resembled Indiana Jones actor Harrison Ford – he stepped down as technical director in December 2021, disillusioned. "Different views" on the policy to be pursued, was the official explanation. Things were going badly for the club and the English media judged harshly. After a 4-1 defeat against city rival Liverpool, Brands even got into a fight with an angry fan.

...Brands was 59 when he left.

...How does working in the Netherlands differ from England?

"It is totally different. The English culture makes fans and media think the manager [the coach] is about transfers. And the owner decides a lot. He wanted Rafael Benítez as coach in 2021, which was not my choice.

"...Benítez wanted Salomon Rondon, which I could not approve. He was already in his 30s, was not on the scouting list, he was not going to bring Everton anything more. Far too high a salary too. I said I thought it was a bad idea."

"...Think of it as a present for the coach, the owner said. Then you are powerless."

But you will be judged on transfers.

"The problem is: there is no patience. Twelve coaches have already been sacked in the Premier League this season. In my second year, Marco Silva was sacked, I tried to prevent that, but it was beyond my control. While I knew: he is a good coach, he is proving that now at Fulham. The owner also stipulated that there should be an experienced successor, while the chairman and I wanted Mikel Arteta. In the end it became Carlo Ancelotti."

What does it do to employees when you are at the mercy of an owner's whims?

"People try to survive. The nasty thing is: in those rounds of layoffs, a lot of good club people often go with them. Physiotherapists, analysts, you name it. I then had to send away people who were good, worked hard. That is difficult. And it doesn't work either. The first few years I still had the idea that I could change something at Everton. But that didn't work out."
Phone calls telling the Coach
Brands cannot go into too much detail "out of respect" for his former employer. But he tells, without being able to name names, about meetings on expensive yachts and phone calls telling the coach who to draft
(  Pick ? Does he mean Usmanov was on the yacht AND making calls to Silva ? )

"You can't imagine that world if you haven't seen it yourself," he says.

An extraordinary adventure, but so you couldn't actually do your job. Why do you still look back with pleasure?

"You also get a lot of appreciation. Because I paid attention to the youth, to the structure, that you look beyond transfers and really try to build something. When I first went to watch Young Everton, I got an app from that coach: how fantastic that you are there, I have never experienced that before. I never saw a technical director from other clubs at duels like that either. And we lived beautifully, the football is great."

Doesn't it strike you as cynical that owners treat it like it's their toy?

"They do have the best interests of the club at heart, I think. But I firmly believe that you can achieve something with good policy. They think: I'm pumping money into it, then it must produce success quickly, right? But in the Premier League, everyone has a lot of money.

Last but not least...

"
The crazy thing is: we get more from commercial activities with PSV than Everton, but they get between 130 and 140 million in TV money [against almost 9 million with PSV]. That makes it all a bit easier."

All I can add is - if this is the 'lite version' and he can't 'Name Names' or by inference - tell more, then it should be a revelation...by why should we be surprised at that
 

Again, all this money laundering talk is utter, utter nonsense.

The only thing you can clean up in sports is your PERSONAL reputation. (eg, Qatar, UAE, KSA)

USM and all it's subsidiaries is a legitimate business operating all over the world. They can (or could, pre Ukraine) funnel money anywhere if they needed to.

Personal wealth? Plenty of countries take money with no questions asked. I myself have had clients who want to pay literal holdalls of money that we cannot accept. Instead, we take them to the bank, the manager goes through the process of "oh no we can't accept that" before calling 20 minutes later to say "we'll accept it for 3%" (an incredible deal for the person wanting to spend the cash btw.... No money laundering scheme gives a 97% return)

Everybody is happy. I get the deal done, client buys what he wants, bank makes easy money.

Countries are 'graded' for compliance in anti money laundering measures. It's a nice thing to shout about, but who gives a toss, really?

Countries that have remained neutral over Ukraine and refused any kind of sanctions are taking that stance because they welcome the Russian money coming in. For example, the latest property spike in Dubai is almost entirely driven by Russian investors who find it difficult to spend anywhere else.

I suspect the vast majority of money going into Everton was Usmanovs as opposed to Moshiris. He wasn't doing it to 'wash' the money that in the eyes if the law was already legitimate, it was a [Poor language removed] swinging exersize. Some people collect watches, some people collect supercars, some of his friends have megayachts..... Very few of them own a world famous sports team.

That's all Everton is/was.... Bragging rights. It's gone wrong (spectacularly) but it's NOT money laundering. Ffs.

You may well be right, it's only a suspicion.

We know that Moshiri is a bit of a loon, but would he really keep throwing his money in like he has? I mean, yeah.... He fabulously wealthy, but the amount he's spent to go backwards has me doubting.

I get the Forbes lists generally undervalue personal wealth, but if you base his spend on those figures he's spent around half of his money on Everton. Madness.

If his mate was spending it's less than a tenth. That's a really bad night at the casino in relative terms.

To disagree with you on all points (bar the last two paragraphs) would be naive. Youre spot on.

Your last two paragraphs arent quite right...he made a fortune with investments during the pandemic. His fortune has increased to such an extent during that time that it covers any 'losses' into the club


Well...... Exactly.

Bang on queue.


I take from this that we didnt need to cancel the sponsorship and shouldnt have done so.
 
To disagree with you on all points (bar the last two paragraphs) would be naive. Youre spot on.

Your last two paragraphs arent quite right...he made a fortune with investments during the pandemic. His fortune has increased to such an extent during that time that it covers any 'losses' into the club




I take from this that we didnt need to cancel the sponsorship and shouldnt have done so.
Yeah, I was aware his wealth increased (reportedly doubled) since he came onboard, it's still a bit too much of a gamble to fund it himself.

He could do, but it would be ridiculous.

I'm certain it was him and his mate hoping to stick two fingers up at Arsenal. It hasn't exactly worked out.
 
Yeah, I was aware his wealth increased (reportedly doubled) since he came onboard, it's still a bit too much of a gamble to fund it himself.

He could do, but it would be ridiculous.

I'm certain it was him and his mate hoping to stick two fingers up at Arsenal. It hasn't exactly worked out.

If i was him, looking at the numbers i think it makes more sense for him to cover the stadium himself...and then look for investors at a far higher premium once built.

He could easily chuck in another $1bil and still have $2bil+ left (which is where he was publicly when he bought us).
 
@BNJ1878 to follow on from my last post.

The values of premier league clubs are only going to continue to increase. Its a major trophy asset and as were now seeing an arena to put owners and investors on a par with even countries.

Enormous global reach and the Americans will no doubt push for more US exposure before long.

Its really a generational wealth creator as long as your club stays in the league and becomes sustainable.
 
If i was him, looking at the numbers i think it makes more sense for him to cover the stadium himself...and then look for investors at a far higher premium once built.

He could easily chuck in another $1bil and still have $2bil+ left (which is where he was publicly when he bought us).
Yep, there's no way he completely bails out now.

I expect he'll push these potential investors for just enough to finish off the stadium, then spend as little as possible to stay afloat.

If he doesn't spend a penny more of his own money, he's shown 100x more ambition that our shitbag of a chairman ever has.

If he wasn't so stupid for keeping them around I'd have sympathy for him.
 

Welcome to GrandOldTeam

Get involved. Registration is simple and free.

Back
Top