Mad the way James Rodriguez wasn’t good enough for us, but Jesse Lingard is
Who said Rodriguez wasnt good enough? He didn’t want to be here
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Mad the way James Rodriguez wasn’t good enough for us, but Jesse Lingard is
All I remember was the goal against City and then him becoming an absolute booze hound culminating in him knocking a cyclist over in his Nissan GTRGod, remember Gibson? We won nearly every game he played for us, but in reality he played about 50 games in 5 years or something, didn't he?
FFS
He had a vendetta against cyclists, but realistically - I can't blame him for that.Then he got bladdered and mowed someone down
A lot of people, and let’s not have this argument again. We know which odious pig wanted him outWho said Rodriguez wasnt good enough? He didn’t want to be here
Exactly
Didn't want to play for the tubby waiter.Who said Rodriguez wasnt good enough? He didn’t want to be here
God, remember Gibson? We won nearly every game he played for us, but in reality he played about 50 games in 5 years or something, didn't he?
FFS
Not easy but need to change direction. For example Mykolenko seems promising and good business, but paying high wages to cast offs which may not work out and have no sell on is just a drain on resources which are clearly limitednkounkou
Moise kean
Gbamin
Not saying you dont try. But this notion they are all out there and just need signing.
nkounkou
Moise kean
Gbamin
Not saying you dont try. But this notion they are all out there and just need signing.
He was on £75k at United so he’ll almost certainly want a massive increase on that29 is not 33.
Nobody has any idea what the wages would be either. I’ve seen people in here being negative and quoting 200k a week with zero evidence.
Even around £100k is an awful lot for a club in our situation. He's going to have been on a good wage at United.29 is not 33.
Nobody has any idea what the wages would be either. I’ve seen people in here being negative and quoting 200k a week with zero evidence.
He cost far too much for a club in our financial position. Nothing to do with ability.A lot of people, and let’s not have this argument again. We know which odious pig wanted him out
Agreed mate I pointed it out earlier, as I see the value free trend the club are actively cultivating, that tells me a lot.
Really mate, 1 out 3 (so far) interesting,
I’m coming to the understanding that we might not be able to pick an approach or strategy and just reboot with young talent exclusively, im seeing red flags in a lot the club is doing in terms of approach, to make me think, we’re going to just manage and limp along with a broken wing until we hit BMD.
The frees are part of that IMO. Wel have the odd signing, but I see the Tarowoskis, Lingards filling the transition void of our limited finances, regulation problems and need to cut losses and push capital toward BMD. Think we will use the loan market to.
We have scope I think to spend 10-20 mill on players this summer (in my opinion) or rather scope in regulation - so not saying we won’t sign a/couple young hungry one or a Dennis or whoever.