Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

 

New Everton Stadium

Anfield will be expanded like it or not. The Main Stand has been a huge succes for them. FSG have already set aside £85mill for redeveloping of Anfield Road.

Seems strange that they would "set aside 85m", when im reading they are looking for sponsors to pay for it and thats even ignoring the fact that they didnt pay for the new stand they already built, it was paid for by a loan.

But hey ho, im SURE they will build it, cos its in the papers, right, RIGHT??????
 
Not necessarily stadiums, but a stadium would have less challenges than a large building, like say, the Liverbuilding or any of the other 2 graces. The tallest building in the world is build on sand.

A large building just goes up, it has a very small foundation and not many of them have 60k visitors every fortnight.
 
Has anybody ever built a stadium "on water" before?

brunton-park-carlisle-under-water_3386292.webp
 

Seems strange that they would "set aside 85m", when im reading they are looking for sponsors to pay for it and thats even ignoring the fact that they didnt pay for the new stand they already built, it was paid for by a loan.

But hey ho, im SURE they will build it, cos its in the papers, right, RIGHT??????

Well they wanted a naming rights for the Main Stand, yet opted for Kenny Dalglish Stand cos they can afford it.
 
Well they wanted a naming rights for the Main Stand, yet opted for Kenny Dalglish Stand cos they can afford it.

To be fair, to them, they have built a new stand and they still have a massive demand, so the increase, if it happens, will be "worthwhile", maybe we should see how we get on with say 52k and take it from there?
 

A large building just goes up, it has a very small foundation and not many of them have 60k visitors every fortnight.

Id be willing to bet money that the lb/Sqin of the Liverbuilding would be larger, by some distance, than that of a packed stadium. Not that it'd matter, they'd just pile to bedrock anyway.

In terms of a building 'just' going straight up.... It's easier to pop a balloon with a pin than your finger.
 
Well they wanted a naming rights for the Main Stand, yet opted for Kenny Dalglish Stand cos they can afford it.

That's the opposite stand isn't it?

I thought they had just decided to wrap the naming of the big stand up with the next shirt sponsorship after failing miserably to find anyone willing to meet their asking price for a stand-alone sponsorship?

Either way, that debacle, the failure of the London Stadium and the silence on this front coming from Spurs suggests naming rights income might not be what we hope if we get something built
 
As one of the advocates for over 60k, here is my reasoning:

In the early 90's Man Utd got lucky with a perfect storm of a good manager and a young team of stars. They went on a run that has seen them since amass 11 league titles and numerous other trophies. During that period they have constantly upgraded their stadium, as the demand matched their success. If I remember correctly Old Trafords capacity was 40k odd at the beginning. They are now looking to go above 80k.

Now say we get just as lucky. We find a decent manager, and thanks to our financial backing, get in some stars. We go on a run of success that sees us win numerous stuff over a 10 year period, and we find ourselves equals to Man Utd. How restricting and short sighted is a 50k stadium going to seem? We'll just find ourselves in a similar position to the one currently facing City and Chelsea. The flip side of that is we don't. We never improve our lot and stay it this level forever, making a 60k seem excessive. I know which scenario I'd prefer us to be moving towards. When I talk about ambition, that is where I'm coming from.

I know currently 60k would be excessive. I also know building a 60k stadium will not bring success, only the team and manger will. I also agree that a 50k will make no difference in us achieving success. But if we don't aim to be the best we can be at everything we do, then what is the point?

Up until the 90's this football club was at the forefront of English football, from being the first purpose built stadium, to the first to fit under soil heating. We are the only English club to have hosted a World Cup semi final. That's how great Goodison used to be. That all stopped with building of the very short sighted Park End, and since then we've become also rans. We just make up the numbers theses days. Why not make this new stadium the start to propel ourselves back to forefront of English football? Aim big, make a statement, make people take us seriously again.

Building a 50k stadium just seems like the Park End all over again; an opportunity to do something great being passed by for the cheaper, better than what we had anyway, alternative.


Nowhere did I mention a 50k stadium, I quoted my opinions based on a 56k - 58k capacity. But who really knows? The fact is the figure will be reached by a combination of Cost, Space availability, Seat and Stadium Design, Revenue stream and the amount of corporate seats.

What it shouldn't be based on is whether it will be 500 seats more than Spurs new ground or 1000 seats bigger than Anfields next expansion. That's just a fruitless exercise. We should aim to have the best with the best atmosphere, not the biggest after Utd.

Also, it's expected that the new ground will be four sided. Who's to say the architect won't incorporate the possibility of further expansion in the design along the two longitudinal sides of the stadium if needed in 20 or 30 years time when team success demands it.
 

Welcome to GrandOldTeam

Get involved. Registration is simple and free.

Back
Top