Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The narrative continues:
Chelsea £200 million hotel
Notice how that story in The Times isnt even behind a paywall.It's what is known as a PR campaign @Goat
Being directed against Everton. I've told you. It's war. Business is war.
Notice how that story in The Times isnt even behind a paywall.
They want you to read it, they want you to share it.
Not a single word.
Chelsea’s £76.5m hotel deals raise questions over PSR compliance
Premier League clubs reacted with exasperation after seeing that Chelsea eased their financial position with the £76.5m sale of two hotels to a sister companywww.theguardian.comThe £76.5m Chelsea hotel deal that Premier League refuses to sign off
Lengthy delay is a huge problem as it leaves uncertainty over whether club have been compliant with Profitability and Sustainability Rules for the 2022-23 seasonwww.thetimes.comChelsea 'AVOID breaking Premier League's PSR rules' after AGM vote
Chelsea had sparked outrage in April after the west London club sold a hotel on their Stamford Bridge site to another company the club owns - in a bid to avoid breaching PSR rules.www.dailymail.co.ukChelsea owners sell hotels to another company they own for £75m ‘in attempt to meet PSR rules’
Sales of hotels will see club’s annual losses ending June of last year drop to £90.1 million from £248.5 millionwww.telegraph.co.ukRival Premier League clubs react after hearing Chelsea sold hotels to ease PSR fears
One executive at a top-flight club was ‘incredulous’ after hearing about the loophole 😬www.givemesport.comChelsea have exploited controversial loophole to work around PSR rules, rival clubs are fuming
Rival clubs are “exasperated” by Chelsea’s controversial loophole that has been used to adhere to the Premier League’s financial rules.www.sportbible.com
More than a single word.
Chelsea’s £76.5m hotel deals raise questions over PSR compliance
Premier League clubs reacted with exasperation after seeing that Chelsea eased their financial position with the £76.5m sale of two hotels to a sister companywww.theguardian.comThe £76.5m Chelsea hotel deal that Premier League refuses to sign off
Lengthy delay is a huge problem as it leaves uncertainty over whether club have been compliant with Profitability and Sustainability Rules for the 2022-23 seasonwww.thetimes.comChelsea 'AVOID breaking Premier League's PSR rules' after AGM vote
Chelsea had sparked outrage in April after the west London club sold a hotel on their Stamford Bridge site to another company the club owns - in a bid to avoid breaching PSR rules.www.dailymail.co.ukChelsea owners sell hotels to another company they own for £75m ‘in attempt to meet PSR rules’
Sales of hotels will see club’s annual losses ending June of last year drop to £90.1 million from £248.5 millionwww.telegraph.co.ukRival Premier League clubs react after hearing Chelsea sold hotels to ease PSR fears
One executive at a top-flight club was ‘incredulous’ after hearing about the loophole 😬www.givemesport.comChelsea have exploited controversial loophole to work around PSR rules, rival clubs are fuming
Rival clubs are “exasperated” by Chelsea’s controversial loophole that has been used to adhere to the Premier League’s financial rules.www.sportbible.com
More than a single word.
I doubt it Mike.Are the Premier League monitoring that as well?
Are you sure mate?No rules have been bent.
We can sell our players as and when and to whom we choose.
The fee agreed is the valuation.
Nothing to see here.
United want Branthwaite on the cheap, we won’t allow it so United have gone crying unfair to the mediait is mike mate or i wouldn’t of ?
I don't see the narrative cos I don't see Damo, dont click the click bait headlines and don't suck Esk off as a side hobby.Are you sure mate?
Are you sure you dont wanna be OUTRAGED by a pushed narrative designed to make people click on stories like deranged hamsters?