Respectfully disagree. I don’t buy that FM/AU just go rogue with the main decisions without being subject to a balances and checks process. (if BK has made this a contactual arrangement in order to stay on as some have speculated - he would have also included contractual arrangements re exec power)
The Board should be there to balance FM’s worst impulses (which you would think is enshrined in any contractual terms)…does FM make decisions on a ‘whim’? Yes - I would think on minor ones. Does he make ALL decisions the same way? No - BUT if I were a board member AND a genuine supporter I resign IF he is doing things that aren’t in the best interests of the club. Or if it is a contractual arrangement, then he would be in breach of it and that has its own remedy.
A circuitous way of stating it, but the bottom line is this,….failure to take the appropriate action (whatever actions that may be) means you are lumped in with FM when it comes to allegations of bad decisions. That is the price you pay as a board member - you are accountable for decisions that got us into this mess.