Same as DCL last week, a fraction off is still off in the rules, it’s frustrating
But if it was consistent, you'd accept it. But we've had yesterday and Calvert Lewin at Fulham given off but the Idak goal at Chelsea was given in similar circumstances.Very much like Beto, you've got a situation where part of the attacking player (trailing leg) is closer to his own goal than any part of the defender, yet it's offside. Bloody hate technology.
Very much like Beto, you've got a situation where part of the attacking player (trailing leg) is closer to his own goal than any part of the defender, yet it's offside. Bloody hate technology.
Can’t understand why we haven’t got this in the Premiership? We have had 2 very narrow decisions go against us in the last 2 games…. Surely this gives you a lot more clarity
No problem with the technology used even if it is close as that but the idea the so called " best league in the world" has to rely on a couple of guys drawing lines on a screen is unacceptable.Can’t understand why we haven’t got this in the Premiership? We have had 2 very narrow decisions go against us in the last 2 games…. Surely this gives you a lot more clarity
Clear and obvious doesn't apply to offside.I still did not see a clear and obvious error from the linesman.
We should lobby for an “official’s call”when it is that tight. Keeps decisions on the field and does away with stupid VAR over-rules.
Clear and obvious doesn't apply to offside.
All goals are checked by VAR.
What does clear and obvious apply to then mate ?