dholliday
deconstructed rep
I don't understand the outrage at that stance - it's akin to someone on RAWK suggesting they might not win the league.
haha, nailed
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't understand the outrage at that stance - it's akin to someone on RAWK suggesting they might not win the league.
how do you know that?
Because if you spend 5 minutes looking the figures for the players wages are out there mate
That just is not true.At the moment it looks like we're going all out to secure - again - our 11th placed trophy. Let's see what the real aspirations are come next week.
No actually, I think you can improve a side without spending big by being smart - otherwise I wouldn't be concerned by the Hart fee or the Bolasie one.
No, what I'm saying is in response to those who think we're going to spend big because Moshiri is here, not in response to what I think is the right way of going about things. I'm saying that there's no evidence that Moshiri is going to bankroll us, so those who believe he will should hold a healthy scepticism until he does, instead of blindly expecting him to smash records all over the shop and so on.
My actual concerns? The lack of a statement signing - just one - that would have made our intent clear early in the window; that we could bring in players without having to sell first. That has now gone, so my major concern now is that incomings have only happened after the sale of Stones, which makes me worry about the future in terms of our ability to make smart signings without having to sell, not big signings.
exactly mate, But dare to suggest anything but the general thought and the place turns into BAWK.And?
I'm talking about the here and now. What I'm saying applies to now and every day of the window - basically I'm advocating caution until stuff actually happens, instead of blindly hoping it happens based on next to nothing. Again, I don't understand the outrage at that stance - it's akin to someone on RAWK suggesting they might not win the league.
And?
I'm talking about the here and now. What I'm saying applies to now and every day of the window - basically I'm advocating caution until stuff actually happens, instead of blindly hoping it happens based on next to nothing. Again, I don't understand the outrage at that stance - it's akin to someone on RAWK suggesting they might not win the league.
No, no you're not. You're behaving exactly the same way you have been since the window opened. Coming on here posting negative guff and attacking anyone who does not agree with you. Posting about "the FACTS" - when we all know there are no FACTS as the club is playing an absolute blinder keeping everything internal.
Hers the issue i have with people putting up figures, they are always scewed to make there argument sound more convincing
Stones was not on 40k - widely reported he was on 30k pw, Pienaar was not on 50-70k and neither was Osman, they where on 50k and 40k respectively, so 120k in those three wages, rather than what your saying which is 160k pw (as the average of figures you stated)
You also have zero idea what wages we are paying Williams, Gueye or Bolasie mate and have just thrown figures out there
Your also ignoring Stek arriving, new deals for sevaral player, Davies, Dowell, Kenny and several more.
Do agree that as it stands right this moment - the reason of selling stones for STCC purposes looks misguided at best and dissengenuous at worst
For me the biggest test of Morshiri is the new stadium and I'd rather he deliver that rather than paying over the odds for a footballer who wouldn't sign for us unless there is a shed load of money on the table who might turn out to be sh1t or do one if another offer comes along.
As I said you can't force someone to sign and the window is still open so those who are saying we haven't spent anything well
1) Stones wanted to go and so he can do one
2) Fee is massive, maybe we should have given him away so that we end up spending our own money
3) FFP means we can't go round spending sums of money on players due to FFP ( AT LEAST NOT YET )
4) Players come and go just cause a player is expensive does not mean he will be good ( Look at the crap the kopites bought for big money )
5) Bids have gone in for multiple players however people think that because it happened 20 years ago we are bidding on players we cannot pay for then reference the SKY money - crazy
Awful lot of the following at the moment on these boards and soon as the window shuts the better
Sales in foil must be booming at the minute