Can't take him serious until he sacks the manager.
I'm not saying Sam guaranteed safety.
Walsh is worse.Can't take him serious until he sacks the manager.
I love the way you quoted me contradicted your point.But you did say it.
“You have to look at it from a risk reward perspective. Sam practically guaranteed safety”
I love the way you quoted me contradicted your point.
But ok.
He’s sacked every manager hat we wanted sacking, hopefully this will be no different.
Because the average tenure of a manager is so short, clubs can effectively have to 'start again' every couple of years when a new manager comes in with his own ideas, different to the last incumbent. Whilst this is great for footballers, agents, and the media, unless a club is super rich it's not good for them. A director of football has to be the one to do exactly that, direct the football at the club to overcome the lack of continuity caused by continually replacing managers. To me, the DOF should be in charge of the manager.
Yeah I agree with that
What I meant I could clarify here , that in our case and in some others I can’t see or imagine the Dof line managing the manager and that’s how it ought to be
I can’t imagine it unless there’s real respect or seniority or if f there’s a proper understanding that he is on the board